On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 16:43:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/1/14, 9:36 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Oh I hadn't realized that. Thanks! That strengthens my opinion
that more
work is needed on the library before inclusion in
std.experimental.
To clarify: I'm very strongly opposed to a design that requires
rebuilding Phobos (or relying on different pre-built versions)
for different logging levels. That's just unacceptable. User
code must be able to set logging levels by just passing flags
to their own builds.
Must be able, but should it be the only possible way?
