On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 00:15:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:55:04PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/29/14, 4:16 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:09:27PM +0000, Robert burner
>Schadek via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 06:09:25 UTC, Andrei
>>Alexandrescu wrote:
>[...]
>>>4. Replace defaultLogger with theLog. "Logger" is a word,
>>>but one
>>>that means "lumberjack" so it doesn't have the appropriate
>>>semantics. The use is generally acceptable as a nice play
>>>on words
>>>and as a disambiguator between the verb "to log" and the
>>>noun
>>>"log". When we actually want to talk about the current log
>>>in an
>>>application, we should, however, call it "the log". This is
>>>negotiable.
>>
>>I really don't care how a global Logger instance is called.
>>Anyone
>>else has an opinion on this? Otherwise Andrei wins.
>[...]
>
>I propose 'stdlog'.
I thought of the same but then rejected it - stdlog looks like
offering the same interface as stdout and stderr. Nevertheless
it's a
sensible choice, too. -- Andrei
I don't like 'theLog'. What about 'defaultLog'?
T
+1 for !theLog. I actually like "dlog" because I hate typing but
defaultLog would be fine.
/uri
