Re: Voting: std.logger

[David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 14:25:49 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On a note less related to bikes, could anybody explain to me 
why a name is something natural to a logger? In other words, 
why does it make sense to complicate the entire design with 
this instead of just using either a set (in place of a map) in 
MultiLogger or at least keeping the whole name concept local to 
it?

Wow, upon further code review I discovered that Logger actually 
overrides opCmp/opEquals to be based on the name (?!). This leads 
to the following gem:

---
void main() {
   import std.logger.filelogger;
   auto a = new FileLogger("asdf", "w");
   auto b = new FileLogger("qwer", "w");
   assert(a == b); // WAT
}
---

Cheers,
David