On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:11:50 +1000 Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> It can be done there, but it would not be 'correct'. The ast should > attempt to match the original code as closely as possible, so that > differences are minimized in di generation and other things like > that. i can't see any sense in increasing compiler complexity for the feature that will be removed anyway. let it be "hacky", so anyone who stomp on it will be tempted to remove it altogether.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
