"ketmar via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
i can't see any sense in increasing compiler complexity for the feature
that will be removed anyway. let it be "hacky", so anyone who stomp on
it will be tempted to remove it altogether.
Nothing gets removed quickly (full deprecation cycle is usually > 18
months), and hacky solution are not acceptable in the mainline compiler as
the risk of causing new bugs is too high. You increase compiler complexity
either way, hacky or not.
