On Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:05:13 +0000 monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> That sounds so much better than UTF-32. why, in the name of hell, do you need UTF-32?! doesn't 0x10000000000000000 chars enough for everyone?! > > btw: are there fonts that can display all unicode? > > i doubt it (ok, maybe one). > Fonts are encoding agnostic, your point is irrelevant. so where can i download font collection with fonts contains all unicode chars? > This is all done without the need for font-display thank you, but i don't need any text i can't display (and therefore read). i bet you don't need to process Thai, for example -- 'cause this requires much more than just character encoding convention. and bytes are encoding-agnostic. > which is on the burden of the final client, and their respective > local needs. hm... text processing software developed on systems which can't display processing text? wow! i want two!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
