V Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:26:59 +0300 ketmar via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> napsáno: > good luck telling users that thay has to have D compiler to build D > compiler. and good luck persuading GNU/Linux programmers that they > need binary blob to compile D compiler. it's deadend -- at least for > GNU/Linux, in which i'm interested. What? I don't see any problem with binary blob. With gcc it is same I need binary blob to be able to compile gcc from source. And if I am really scary of binary dmd compiler I can still use last C++ version and compile it with gcc, then use this product to compile next ddmd and so on.
Re: Self-hosting D compiler -- Coming Real Soon Now(tm)
Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d Thu, 11 Sep 2014 03:01:25 -0700
- Re: Self-hosting D ... Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D ... Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D ... Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D ... Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D comp... Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D compiler -- C... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D compiler... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D compiler... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D compiler -- C... Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D compiler... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D comp... Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hosting D ... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-hostin... Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Self-h... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
