On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:38:21 +0100 Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's not a very accurate view at all. GCC and Clang are written in > a very idiomatic C++, but does that make people think C++x14 features > are dangerous and untested? being "blessed by committee" has it's advantages. ;-) there is no "D committee" (thanks to all existing and inexisting gods for that!), so the only source of trust is compiler developer(s). if compiler developers avoid using new features, those features aren't "blessed", they are dangerous and all that.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
