On 11 Sep 2014 18:35, "Joakim via Digitalmars-d" < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 15:24:41 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> >> there is no "D committee" (thanks to all existing and inexisting gods >> for that!), so the only source of trust is compiler developer(s). if >> >> compiler developers avoid using new features, those features aren't >> "blessed", they are dangerous and all that. > > > This is already the case with the pure C++ version of dmd, as David said, since D is currently not used to write any of the D compilers. >
*cough* SDC *cough* In any case, I'll reiterated again. It's not as if the C++ implementation of D uses any features of C++ that were invented in the last decade... Iain.
