Re: C++ interop - what to do about long and unsigned long?

[Jakob Ovrum via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 14 September 2014 at 04:26:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
On 9/13/14, 8:43 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree. It should be the default in all cases, as unanimously 
agreed by
this community, and overruled by Andrei post-implementation.

There was no unanimity. -- Andrei

+1. I like the status quo except I regret that there's no nice 
way to express non-final as I'm a big fan of using the 
`attribute:` syntax.