V Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:46:04 +0000 IgorStepanov via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> napsáno:
> Why not subj? > D allows annotate with UDA the most of named symbols. > There are three category of named symbols, which cannot be > annotated: module declarations, function arguments and enum > members. > Enum members are trivial symbols and annotation possibility for > them probably does not make sense. > However, annotation unpossibility for module declaration and > function arguments looks strange. Month ago I need UDA for module declarations too, so I hack my own version of DMD. It would be fine if this would be in upstream.
