Re: UDA for module declaration.

Wed, 17 Sep 2014 05:13:45 -0700 

On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:46:04 +0000
IgorStepanov via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why not subj?
this can be very useful, so i'm sure that it will be called "useless"
and "broken".

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to