I don't know of any OOP in the STL, unless you mean the
1980's stuff
like iostreams and the other shit most people avoid using, but
I don't
think this is considered part of the STL
Any use of a class instance is part of OOP.
IOStreams, iterators, strings, containers, ranges, filesytem,
networking, graphics, traits
Being lazy, and counting its occurrences in comments and when
used as
instead of typename in templates as well
/cygdrive/c/android-sdk/android-ndk/sources/cxx-stl/gnu-libstdc++/4.8/include
$ grep -R class * | uniq | wc -c
15601
STL is a name that stuck from the old days when it wasn't part
of the language. Nowadays it is just the C++ standard library.
--
Paulo
According to Stepanov STL author:
http://www.stlport.org/resources/StepanovUSA.html
"Yes. STL is not object oriented. I think that object
orientedness is almost as much of a hoax as Artificial
Intelligence. I have yet to see an interesting piece of code that
comes from these OO people."
I'd agree with him, just using a class, because it is the
primary abstraction in C++, does not make your code OOP.
