On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 10:12:56 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 09:25:07 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 02:54:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
As there was quite some last moment feedback I am giving some
more time for me to research issues a bit and Robert to
address them :)
No need, I fixed the MultiLogger last weekend.
"Fixed" by simply removing the attempt at logarithmic time
operations, and still not conforming to the Phobos container
interface...
Yes, because other people already complained that nobody will
every need a logarithmic time MulitLogger and I always thought
that MultiLogger was to complex anyway. I could make the Logger[]
array alias this and it would be comforming to Phobos container,
but that doesn't really solve the issue does it.