On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 02:54:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
As there was quite some last moment feedback I am giving some more time for me to research issues a bit and Robert to address them :)
The Pareto Principle could be worth mentioning here. We were 80% of the way to a quality interface a long time ago, but the last 20% is taking a disproportionate amount of time to iron out. I think all this criticism is indicative that we're holding this module to a high standard rather than the code being bad, which I think is a very good thing. Thankfully Marco stepped up and provided a solution to the threading problem, so I don't think it's that far off.
Apropos threading though, I'm not sure how to consolidate the fact that we're using shared memory without using `shared`. It seems like a failure to have such an intricately designed memory model, then as soon as we do threading in Phobos, we ignore it.
I still intend to go through all the documentation and fix things I can spot as soon as the interface is finalized.
