On 10/15/14, 4:25 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/14/2014 11:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-10-15 07:57, Walter Bright wrote:
Why do you need non-fatal unittests?
I don't know if this would cause problems with the current approach.
But most
unit test frameworks don't NOT stop on the first failure, like D does. It
catches the exception, continues with the next test and in the end
prints a
final report.
I understand that, but I don't think that is what Dicebot is looking
for. He's looking to recover from unittests, not just continue.
I think this means you can't get stack traces for exceptions thrown in
unit tests, right?
