On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 at 07:26:03 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/14/2014 11:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-10-15 07:57, Walter Bright wrote:
Why do you need non-fatal unittests?
I don't know if this would cause problems with the current
approach. But most
unit test frameworks don't NOT stop on the first failure, like
D does. It
catches the exception, continues with the next test and in the
end prints a
final report.
I understand that, but I don't think that is what Dicebot is
looking for. He's looking to recover from unittests, not just
continue.
How can one continue without recovering? This will result in any
kind of environment not being cleaned and false failures of other
tests that share it.
