Correctness requires using size_t.
Re: 'int' is enough for 'length' to migrate code from x86 to x64
David Eagen via Digitalmars-d Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:01:38 -0800
Isn't the purpose of size_t is to be large enough to address all
available memory? A negative value is not only too small but
doesn't make sense when discussing lengths.
- Re: 'int' is e... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is e... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is e... Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is e... FrankLike via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is e... Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is e... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is e... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'length... Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'length' to migr... matovitch via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'length' to migr... Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'length' to... David Eagen via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'length... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'length... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'length... Don via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'le... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'le... FrankLike via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for 'le... David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enough for... bearophile via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is enoug... David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is e... bearophile via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 'int' is e... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
