On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:59:04 +0000
David Eagen via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:

> Isn't the purpose of size_t is to be large enough to address all 
> available memory? A negative value is not only too small but 
> doesn't make sense when discussing lengths.
> 
> Correctness requires using size_t.
yes. besides, there is no such thing as "negative length", so it's
somewhat... weird to use signed integer for length.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to