On Thursday, 11 December 2014 at 13:43:07 UTC, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
It will, use @system.
Yes…
Maybe this proposal will be supplemented later, but there are
always costs to making the language more complicated. We need
to be certain they are worth it before adding them. A cautious
approach can be extended later, if the situation demands it.
Can it be extended later? Without breaking stuff?
You need to get it right from the start, otherwise you end up
with N different, but incompatible ways of doing the same thing.
That means you need to get ownership right first.
