On 12 December 2014 at 22:18, via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, 12 December 2014 at 08:42:22 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> >> How can a member be marked scope? Apparently it's a storage class, not >> a type constructor... we can only attribute storage classes to >> function args/results(?). > > > I was talking about my proposal here, where it's a type modifier, not a > storage class.
Oh okay. Is that still on the table? > deadalnix also brought up the problem of transitivity. This, too, would > simply go away if it's a type modifier. Just for clarity, does type modifier mean the same thing as type constructor?
