On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:28:16 +0000 Vic via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8781522 > > http://arthurtw.github.io/2014/12/21/rust-anti-sloppy-programming-language.html > > c'est possible! > > Oh how much free time and stability there would be if D core > *moved* GC downstream. > > Vic > ps: more cows waiting for slaughter: > http://dlang.org/comparison.html oh, how much usefullness there would be if D core suspended all other activities and maked GC on par with "industrial strength" GCs! i'm trying to tell you that i LOVE GC. and i can't share the (growing?) attitute that GC is a poor stepson. what we really need is a better GC, not "no GC".
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
