On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 03:32:12 UTC, Vic wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 00:49:57 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 23:21:17 UTC, Vic wrote:
I am not saying no GC; I am saying:
a) something needs to be moved out of core.

And many don't agree.

<snip>

Dear Anonymous,

IMO D needs to be more stable, the alternative is more and more features and less and less commercial users and followed by less maintainers that don't want a dead project to work on. D 'marketing' brings people in, who then leave. So I proposed: Do like GO does w/ Exceptions ( I can send link again if need)

*What* would be another way to get stability that is not fantasy?

I consider the surface area of features vs available volunteer maintainers at hand. If you are not sold, look at CLR and JRE features relative to D features. Now look at the size of their maintenance teams as relative FTE.

Does that look as sustainable?

Hence a prediction: major things will be moved out of core to 3rd party plugins to slim down the lang, because now it's more than a lang: it is a platform.

Vic

+1

Reply via email to