On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 14:20:24 +0000 Dicebot via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> DMD is not much suitable for anything but experiments and > debugging anyway. i was thinking the same, but i found that code produced by DMD is acceptable in most cases. there is no much need in thightly optimized code for most tasks, as tasks tend to be either bound by I/O or by user. i found that even some real-time graphics is ok with DMD. so i can't agree with you on this matter. > > and i think that DMD is most widely-used D compiler nowdays > Those who care about generated binaries don't use DMD, that simple besides, it's not always possible to use GDC or LDC, as they tend to be off by at least one frontend/phobos version, or have some unfixed bugs that prevents building binary.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
