On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:10:17 +0000 Kapps via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 14:08:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 14:04:56 UTC, ketmar via > > Digitalmars-d wrote: > >> Hello. > >> > >> i was never thinking about it, but recently i found parts of > >> source > >> code in my compiled D binary. they comes from code generation > >> functions, which only used in compile time, yet still happily > >> sits in > >> resulting binary. are there any plans to somehow "fix" that? > > > > LDC fixes that by using garbage collection of unused symbols by > > default. > > Does DMD/Optlink on Windows do this too? I've noticed that using > DMD/Optlink on Windows, my executable is 4MB for unittests on a > module that uses a lot of CTFE template methods, while with > DMD/ld on Linux (and I believe GDC/ld as well), the same test > executable is over 40MB. do `strip -s` with the executable and you will find that most of that is various debug info.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
