does that mean, that sociomantics is writing crappy, fault prone
and unusable software?
they are the praised light on D's sky when evangelizing D, even
if everybody thinks they are using D2.
are they dumb or just uneducated?
On Saturday, 27 December 2014 at 14:27:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 14:27:38 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 13:54:24 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 13:16:32 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 12:59:33 UTC, Dicebot
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 15:49:46 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
What would be the point of it? D1 is almost absolutely
inferior to D2 (both compiler and language) and lacks any
better tools recently created by the community.
I do not contest that. But will be a less-deceiving
entry-point for those that are new to the language, they will
bite and would wish to see more...
It sounds like you have overly positive memories of D1. Working
with it daily and especially dealing with all the compiler bugs
we had back then (and still have with dmd1) - it is hardly an
experience I'd want newcomer to have. Lacking quality of the
toolchain kills any benefit from the language simplicity.
