On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 11:46:19 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
That is where the value-for-money factor comes in. I cannot see any traction occurring in Joakim's badly thought out idea unless you have
some *new* to give.

I somehow feel that there is a commercial closed source opportunity in reducing the feature set somewhat (and fix critical bugs) then redo the memory model so that it performs well in production.

It makes sense for a business that have 5 developers working on a product to pay $10.000/year to get more productive. Of course, this is a shaky business model since the ROI could go out the window if the D community decides that a stable polished version of D is a worthy goal...

Reply via email to