On 1/16/15 9:41 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
That reply was not about my pull request specifically. Since it basically consists of two new files, it can stay there for months without generating any additional work for me. But it is a good counterexample to the »just close old stuff«-policy.
I agree that a hamfisted policy would do more harm than good. That's why it's so hard to define!
I'm thinking of something like: if there's $(legitimate) request for changes but the author is dormant for more than $(X) days, then close.
Andrei Macros: legitimate=? X=?
