On Friday, 16 January 2015 at 21:55:13 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Friday, 16 January 2015 at 21:41:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Please help us work the kinks out! Walter will be proceeding
with the opt-in implementation for quicker pipelining.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25
Andrei
I'm working on an article/DIP which actually goes further than
the new DIP25, but is nonetheless completely compatible with
it. I'll have the article in a day or two.
I'm very interested in that!
I think the `return` notation is a good idea, and can maybe be
reused in a more complete `scope` proposal. A downside is that it
only applies to the return value, but not to other `out` and
`ref` parameters. But the `!` syntax can work here, too.
