On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 17:08:42 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday, 16 January 2015 at 21:55:13 UTC, Zach the Mystic
I'm working on an article/DIP which actually goes further than
the new DIP25, but is nonetheless completely compatible with
it. I'll have the article in a day or two.
I'm very interested in that!
I think the `return` notation is a good idea, and can maybe be
reused in a more complete `scope` proposal. A downside is that
it only applies to the return value, but not to other `out` and
`ref` parameters. But the `!` syntax can work here, too.
Yup. In fact, my DIP is partly inspired the 'scope!' syntax
suggestion in your DIP.
