On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 17:08:12 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
sure i have. i made alot of patches to the parser, so i know
how it
is written. to make this work parser need to be changed not
less than
to accept '@' before `pure`, `nothrow` and so on, and this
change was
rejected due to added complexity for supporting it by devteam.
I'm sorry but this is not a good reason. It would be failry easy
to add this in SDC's parser, so now what ? it tells nothing about
the feature and everything about DMD's parser.
as for "will not be used" -- you can use google to count
requests for
this feature. the numbers will show you how much people miss it.
i have no habit of writing tales from the faery world, you know.
Absence of information is not information.
