On 1/18/15 10:57 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/18/2015 7:07 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:24:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/18/2015 12:46 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 08:40:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. If I wasn't clear, I think that class
change was a
mistake.
Now that I see from that pull request that the ugly syntax was the
original, I'm
not so sure. The dfix feature I'm planning is to convert
class A if (B) : C
to
class A : C if (B)
The other way around. Consider:
class A(T) : C!(args), D!(more args), E!(lots of stuff) if (B)
the 'if' becomes significantly separated from A.
That's exactly why I thing both should be allowed.
No. Constraints belong after the template declaration, not embedded in
the template's implementation.
I just want to point out then, the OP is asking for this same thing
(template constraint to be allowed after the template declaration).
-Steve
