On Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 08:09:16 UTC, user wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 12:02:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
GUI does not belong to Phobos.

That's the only reason I use Java instead of D. If GUI is not in phobos, it has no guaranteed support. Of course this is because I only create GUI desktop application.

Apparently this is only my issue, all others seems to be ok with no GUI in phobos.

Getting into Phobos does not add magical support guarantees. If there is a good GUI library in dub registry, you will get as much support from its author there as if it was in Phobos. Much more, in fact, as getting any changes is more difficult and time-consuming than into owned package.

Most important additions to Phobos are those that can define standard API for building user libraries on top. Very common utilities that have no real controversy about their implementation are good too, though less important.

But there are many different incompatible GUI options out there and no single option that would satisfy everyone. Even worse, there is no such "fits everyone" library out there at all, in any language.

Reply via email to