On Monday, 16 February 2015 at 08:08:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/31/2015 11:52 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
@Walter:
Making export a attribute seems to be the preferred choice in
this discussion.
Additionaly this was the result of the last discussion around
export, a year
ago, although for different reasons. The last Discussion
resulted in DIP 45
which also proposes making export an attribute. Before I start
with the
implementation, would you be ok with making export an
attribute or would you
veto it?
At this point I suggest simply making those private helper
functions public and export them. It gets your project moving
without waiting for language changes (and this is a breaking
change).
This is not about some private project but about fixing language
itself.
