On Sunday, 15 February 2015 at 21:23:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The one possible change would be to allow "in" with statically-sized arrays, under the assumption that the amount of data searched is fixed and proportional to the size of the program.

To be really consistent,
    x in arr
would need to be equivalent to:
    (x >= 0) && (x < arr.length)

`in` tests for the presence of a _key_ in AAs, and the equivalent notion of a key for arrays is an index.

Reply via email to