On Monday, 16 February 2015 at 13:10:44 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Marc Schütz" " wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
To be really consistent,
x in arr
would need to be equivalent to:
(x >= 0) && (x < arr.length)
`in` tests for the presence of a _key_ in AAs, and the
equivalent notion of a key for arrays is an index.
It's called 'in', not 'haskey'. Is 3 in the array? Is 7 in
the map? Everybody understands what it means and the whole
argument is nonsense.
I disagree with that; the difference between keys and values is
pretty obvious to me, as is the analogy with indices (both go
inside the []). But the entire discussion is pointless, because
`in` will not be changed (and for good reasons!).
