On 3/3/15 7:38 AM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Monday, 2 March 2015 at 22:58:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:Pretty dazz idea, dontcha think? And DIP25 still stands unscathed :-)Unless, of course, we missed something obvious.I was dazzed, but I'm not anymore. I wrote my concern here: http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
There's a misunderstanding here. The object being assigned keeps a trailing list of past values and defers their deallocation to destruction. -- Andrei
