There is certain appeal in such attitude but many people (including me) chose D for its pragmatical power and possibility to tweak the language use for specific project/company needs. You will only get more community fragmentation by going this way.
Walter, please understand, that no choice alone (in vacuum) is
good or bad. "One true way" was good decision for Go because it
comes as part of consistent opinionated approach to language
design. It isn't just matter of formatting but applies to all
decisions - either you do what language authors consider "right"
or simply can't use the language properly.
- Re: dfmt options Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Orvid King via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Mathias Lang via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Szymon Gatner via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d
- Re: dfmt options Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
