On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote: > Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it for awhile.
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple part and a pattern matching part. The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we wanted to wait, whether more needs come up. By now it's already 2 years old and it still looks complete IMO. http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32
