On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:12:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it
for awhile.
I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple
part and
a pattern matching part.
The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we
wanted to
wait, whether more needs come up. By now it's already 2 years
old and it
still looks complete IMO.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32
What was the conclusion about parens tuples? They would be much
prettier.
