On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 21:53:29 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/31/2015 08:24 PM, deadalnix wrote:
I'm going to propose again the same thing as in the past :
- before CTFE switch pool.
- CTFE in the new pool.
- deep copy result from ctfe pool to main pool.
- ditch ctfe pool.
No, it's trivial enough to implement a full AST interpreter.
The way it's done currently (using AST nodes as CTFE
interpreter values)
makes it very hard to use a distinct allocator, because
ownership can
move from CTFE to compiler and vice versa.
This is why I introduced a deep copy step in there.
