On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 05:52:47 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I think point about `export` is important. Tying definition of
"API" to `export` instead of `public` fits much better
definition of those attributes (latter only guarantees symbol
access, former also ensures cross-binary availablity) and
allows for more explicit migration step (as `export` is widely
underused right now).
Also the issue you have pointed out about API templates that
call private functions is essentially same issue as Benjamin
was pointing out here :
http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
I can't propose good solution here right now but I do believe
those 2 problems need to be solved in one step.
Although I'd still want to see dust around reference counting
DIPs settled first to get a full attention on this matter and
avoid commiting to premature solution.
