On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 15:12:18 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 12:49:19 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
I'd suggest a fresh look be introduced when the ref counting and GC work has been done,

Believe it or not i'm not opposed to this.

and personally I'd suggest just a simple clean 2D metro-ish "D" as the "logo",

No. This is fashion. Hire a professional to do it and make long term usability a requirement. The 2d flat look will feel very old when the big boys (Microsoft, Apple) move on.

I don't think any of the proposed logos have been better than the current one (which also works well as a tiny icon), but you could easily flatten the logo by just keeping the white symbol and put it on a black bar with the menu beneath as part of the current webpage upgrade. You could keep the red by making the tiny circle red.

The current image is a little bit "overdone" and so much red is "screaming".

Changing the outline of the logo without backing it up with a major language version announcement is rather pointless IMO.

Reply via email to