On Mon, 25 May 2015 23:19:26 +0000, weaselcat wrote: > On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 22:48:59 UTC, ketmar wrote: >> On Mon, 25 May 2015 22:46:51 +0000, weaselcat wrote: >> >>> then contribute to LDC? >> >> sorry, not interested in LLVM in any way. not that "it should die", but >> "i don't care if it exists or not". > > LLVM addresses every issue you complained about in GCC.
non-GPL. that means "non-existent" for me.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
