On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 00:24:20 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2015 23:19:26 +0000, weaselcat wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 22:48:59 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2015 22:46:51 +0000, weaselcat wrote:
then contribute to LDC?
sorry, not interested in LLVM in any way. not that "it should
die", but
"i don't care if it exists or not".
LLVM addresses every issue you complained about in GCC.
non-GPL. that means "non-existent" for me.
you're aware that the dmd backend is proprietary, right?
