Re: Evaluation order of index expressions

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 22:54:55 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/26/2015 07:48 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 12:51:20 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I guess overloaded operators could be made to cache the old 
value. (As
they do in CTFE, apparently. :o))
However, this seems like overkill. Any other ideas?

They can but it wouldn't fix anything. The rvalue is already 
evaluated
by then.

I.e. they can't.

You could make the right hand side lazy or something, but yeah, 
overkill.