On 06/08/2015 09:30 AM, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 18:50:07 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/06/2015 08:10 AM, ketmar wrote:
if `auto` can play a role of type placeholder
There is no such thing as a type placeholder.
there is:
`immutable auto` -- ok
`immutable const` -- not ok
ergo, `auto` is not a storage class, but type placeholder.
This analogy does not work. 'immutable' and 'automatic storage' do not
conflict. 'immutable' and 'const' do conflict.
'immutable auto' is exactly the same as 'auto immutable'. There is no
'int immutable'.
