On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 13:38:08 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote: > On 06/08/2015 09:30 AM, ketmar wrote: >> On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 18:50:07 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote: >> >>> On 06/06/2015 08:10 AM, ketmar wrote: >>>> if `auto` can play a role of type placeholder >>> >>> There is no such thing as a type placeholder. >> >> there is: >> >> `immutable auto` -- ok `immutable const` -- not ok >> >> ergo, `auto` is not a storage class, but type placeholder. >> >> > This analogy does not work. 'immutable' and 'automatic storage' do not > conflict. 'immutable' and 'const' do conflict. > > 'immutable auto' is exactly the same as 'auto immutable'. There is no > 'int immutable'.
ok. what that "automatic storage" means after all? except being a placeholder.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
