On 6/8/15 1:25 PM, ponce wrote:
C++'s constexpr looks broken because everything must be marked constexpre, which defeats the purpose of having compile-time code looking like runtime code. But I never had the pleasure to use it.
Yeah, it's sadly quite björked. Scott Meyers and I looked at the feature and the logical conclusion for a guideline was "Speculatively mark everything in sight as constexpr". That doesn't quite scale. -- Andrei
