On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 18:50:33 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Yes, and it's an obvious issue. Some of the most frequently requested things are real tuple syntax, pattern matching, etc. Short of getting these into D itself(good luck,) any attempt at these will end up being an ugly hack.

This is neither obvious issue, not a good solution.

The fact that no one will implement custom pattern matching until it comes into language officially is a Good Thing (TM).

Reply via email to